Antidiscrimination polices have reached a dead end when it comes to practice. Denver-based bakery is presently entangled in a lawsuit for religious discrimination, after the company declined to prepare a cake inscribed with pictures and messages targeting the gay.
This conflict springs new dilemmas with regards to gay rights and religious freedoms after different bakeries got fined for declining to serve gay couples because of religious complaints. To put it simply what are the repercussions for a bakery that refuses to deliver a cake that displays slogans going against their moral convictions but stumbles on the inclining side of social equity?
Marjorie Silva, manager of Azucar Bakery, says this was the premise of her rejection to finish the cake as ordered back in March of 2014, when a client named Bill Jack gave her a paper with a rundown of expressions like “God hates Gays” that he wanted her to design on the cakes. What’s more, the client likewise requested a picture of two men holding hands with a “X” on top, as indicated by Silva.
Silva consented to make the cake but declined to compose the messages that the client was asking for calling. However, she did offer him the bakery ingredients so he could apply draw the message himself.
Jack went to a local news station and stated he felt discriminated by the pastry kitchen. Jack has likewise submitted a complaint with the social liberties division of the Department of Regulatory Agencies, who is presently investigating the shop for discrimination. Silva believes that it should not matter what is a person’s orientation or creed and everybody should respect each other.
This examination is going on while another pastry specialist in suburban Denver, Jack Phillips, who declined to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, is battling a legal order obliging him to serve gay couples despite the fact that he contended that wouldviolate his religious convictions.
It seems shaky precedents add up as Republican Sen. Kevin Lundberg said the new case is a matter of conflicting values and even ventured to contend that Colorado’s open settlement law is not living up to expectations.
“The state shouldn’t come in and say to the individual businessman, ‘You must violate your religious — and I’ll say religious-slash-moral convictions. This baker (Silva), thought that was a violation of their moral convictions. The other baker, which we all know very well because of all the stories, clearly that was a violation of their religious convictions”.
Phillips’ lawyer, Nicolle Martin, has mentioned that Silva is in the same category as her customer. Martin expressed her support for Silva’s actions claiming it was her right to choose what inscriptions to display on the cake. In her turn, Silva contended that she should have been the one filling a complaint against the customer as his message was very discriminating. American people seem to be confronting a catch-22 situation as nowadays people can end up with legal suits for discrimination for rejecting to compose something discriminatory.
Image Source: Inquisitir